Sports media: Broadcast networks all-in on sports gambling



Don’t be concerned with the over/under on when sports networks will become completely transparent about wanting an element of gambling to be part of their viewership. The age of innocence — and feigning indifference — is over.

Don’t be concerned with the over/under on when sports networks will become completely transparent about wanting an element of gambling to be part of their viewership.

The age of innocence — and feigning indifference — is over.

Coded language is being used less and less by media executives positioning themselves to capitalize on the effects of last year’s Supreme Court decision that allows states to legalize sports books.

One quote in particular resonated from last week’s Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, from Turner Sports’ David Levy, whose company recently coordinated the Tiger Woods-Phil Mickelson golf match in Las Vegas, rich with live-screen gambling odds and results:
 
“Here's what we know about sports betting. If you bet on a game, you're almost 80-90% more likely to watch the event,” Levy said. “If you watch more of the event, you're engaged. And if you're engaged, guess what happens to ratings? One of the metrics for Nielsen is time spent viewing. And with more time spent viewing, ratings will go up.”

Here’s another educated guess: More media wants in on the action, and will normalize the process as much as is digestible.
Last Friday, NBC Sports Washington aired the first of eight “alternative sports betting-infused broadcasts” for the NBA’s Wizards. On a parallel feed, viewers saw live “moneyline” odds with continual on-screen stats. An interactive element across the bottom of the screen was essentially a rotation of prop bets that could enhance a chance at winning a “Predict the Game” contest for a $500 prize.

Darren Rovell of the Action Network reported Monday that 20% of the people who streamed the broadcast watched only the alternative feed. Imagine that option for a Lakers or Clippers telecast.

“I live in the D.C. area and haven’t watched a game all year long,” one viewer from Maryland told The Action Network. “Yet I’m playing along on a Friday night. This idea is brilliant.”

Don’t be concerned with the over/under on when sports networks will become completely transparent about wanting an element of gambling to be part of their viewership.
The age of innocence — and feigning indifference — is over.

Coded language is being used less and less by media executives positioning themselves to capitalize on the effects of last year’s Supreme Court decision that allows states to legalize sports books.

One quote in particular resonated from last week’s Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, from Turner Sports’ David Levy, whose company recently coordinated the Tiger Woods-Phil Mickelson golf match in Las Vegas, rich with live-screen gambling odds and results:
 
“Here's what we know about sports betting. If you bet on a game, you're almost 80-90% more likely to watch the event,” Levy said. “If you watch more of the event, you're engaged. And if you're engaged, guess what happens to ratings? One of the metrics for Nielsen is time spent viewing. And with more time spent viewing, ratings will go up.”
Here’s another educated guess: More media wants in on the action, and will normalize the process as much as is digestible.

Last Friday, NBC Sports Washington aired the first of eight “alternative sports betting-infused broadcasts” for the NBA’s Wizards. On a parallel feed, viewers saw live “moneyline” odds with continual on-screen stats. An interactive element across the bottom of the screen was essentially a rotation of prop bets that could enhance a chance at winning a “Predict the Game” contest for a $500 prize.

Darren Rovell of the Action Network reported Monday that 20% of the people who streamed the broadcast watched only the alternative feed. Imagine that option for a Lakers or Clippers telecast.

“I live in the D.C. area and haven’t watched a game all year long,” one viewer from Maryland told The Action Network. “Yet I’m playing along on a Friday night. This idea is brilliant.”
Sign up for our daily sports newsletter »

If NBC companies are part of the testing ground for any of this, perhaps someday Al Michaels won’t have to cleverly couch over/under numbers on a “Sunday Night Football” broadcast and simply will refer to them on the scroll across the bottom of the screen.

“I’m as curious and fascinated as anyone on how this will work, in this new age of digital and interactive watching,” Michaels said Monday. “The networks ultimately have to be aligned with the leagues, because they have a certain degree of control. The NBA has been, to use a football term, really ahead of the chains in doing this.

“I do get a kick out of watching [ESPN’s late-night ‘SportsCenter’ host] Scott Van Pelt and how he pulls off the ‘One Big Thing’ because I think getting all that out in the open, people can have fun with [gambling information]. I was almost ready to throw something out during the Indianapolis-Kansas City game” — an NBC playoff telecast last Saturday — “when there was a late touchdown, but I realized that it was a couple points short” of affecting the spread.

“I will say this,” Michaels added. “Gambling information won’t have a negative impact on ratings. People who want to watch, whether they’re betting or not, won’t go away, but it makes sense that some will stay tuned longer because of it.”

This article is a reprint from LaTimes.com.   To view the original story and comment, click here


Sign-up for the OSGA Newsletter!

Every week get news and updates, exclusive offers and betting tips delivered right to you email inbox.